And BTW, you CAN search by conductor, soloist, composer, etc. I find myself sitting down to listen to music while reading a book at night, and before I know it, I've listened to way more music than I had expected and hardly read my book. It's search functions are phenomenal for classical music. I'm a new subscriber to Primephonic's top tier (hi-res). (No affiliation - just a happy subscriber) ![]() Primephonic has gone all-out to be the best classical music streaming service available today. The work that went into this simply awesome. This is a real time guide that explains passages in the music you are currently listening to. Primephonic has vastly improved on many, many levels: search (as good as Idagio), selection, support, booklets and documentation, music curation and suggestions based on listener history and finally they have now introduced what is called Maestro Listening guide. I am also a Spotify Premium subscriber (for popular music). I gave up my Idagio subscription when Primephonic offered a half-price introductory year price (about $75). I've been a Primephonic subscriber since September. ![]() Spotify's search is best, but I'm finding Qobuz's search to be passably good. This seemed to be difficult to do in Primephonic. For classical music, it is important to me to be able to be able to filter on performer and/or conductor. Search Quality: From what I remember, search in Primephonic was difficult to use. Qobuz has enough gaps in content filled so that this is not so much of an issue. Qobuz also has this issue, but to a lesser degree. When I did searches, I would often only be able to see one track shown from an album. The benefit of more presence is that recordings are more engaging because they sound more alive rather than just being reproduced.Īmount of Content: Also, Primephonic's lack of music content was an issue. Qobuz provides more presence around instruments and voices while Primephonic, though good, tends to sound more 2-dimensional in its sound quality. Sound quality: A Primephonic's sound quality was quite good, but Qobuz' sound quality was still noticeably better. Spotify Premium (320 kbps Ogg Vorbis which is not lossless) My subjective impressions of the musicality of the major HD streaming services:ģ. Price: Low.Adding Primephonic (a classical-only service) to the list as well: Spotify - Largest catalog, Great interface and automated music suggestions, No CD quality, no hires, Cannot purchase music, If your own music is on your computer, can be added to your playlist then added on mobile. You can purchase songs through Amazon, Large catalog. Price: NominalĪmazon - Most songs at least CD quality but some are not, Some hires, Sound Quality issues on some songs, Songs already on or added to your device can be played and added to playlists. Tidal - Most songs at least CD quality but some are not, MCA ☹ for hires, Sound Quality issues on some songs, Larger popular song catalog, cannot play your own songs that you have loaded on your device only songs you stream, downloaded, or purchased via Tidal. ![]() Qubuz - Flawless sound, no songs below CD quality, low cost hires purchases with Sublime tier, smaller popular music catalog, cannot play your own songs that you have loaded on your device only songs you stream, downloaded, or purchased via Qubuz. I have tried Spotify, Tidal, Qubuz and Tidal, and Amazon.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |